Windbg:打破定时器/调度程序中断并打印EIP

有没有办法在Windows上的中断服务例程上设置一个断点,它负责触发线程调度并打印被中断的线程的EIP?

我试图用hal!HalpClockInterrupt但它似乎不是正确的地方。 nt!KeUpdateRunTime接缝更好:

Breakpoint 3 hit nt!KeUpdateRunTime: 805410dc a11cf0dfff mov eax,dword ptr ds:[FFDFF01Ch] kd> !thread THREAD 82c23bf0 Cid 0320.0474 Teb: 7ffa2000 Win32Thread: 00000000 RUNNING on processor 0 Impersonation token: e1c1f990 (Level Impersonation) Owning Process 0 Image: <Unknown> Attached Process 82c2dca0 Image: svchost.exe Wait Start TickCount 6298 Ticks: 14 (0:00:00:00.218) Context Switch Count 64 IdealProcessor: 0 UserTime 00:00:00.453 KernelTime 00:00:04.312 Win32 Start Address 0x7730a5f7 Start Address 0x7c8106f9 Stack Init f4dc1000 Current f4dc0d34 Base f4dc1000 Limit f4dbe000 Call 0 Priority 8 BasePriority 8 PriorityDecrement 0 DecrementCount 0 ChildEBP RetAddr Args to Child f4dc0d54 805410ae 00000000 000000d1 0197fb94 nt!KeUpdateRunTime (FPO: [1,1,0]) f4dc0d54 806d2c9e 00000000 000000d1 0197fb94 nt!KeUpdateSystemTime+0x13e (FPO: [0,2] TrapFrame @ f4dc0cdc) f4dc0d54 805410ae 00000000 000000d1 0197fb94 hal!HalEndSystemInterrupt+0x4e (FPO: [2,2,0]) f4dc0d54 77306f5f 00000000 000000d1 0197fb94 nt!KeUpdateSystemTime+0x13e (FPO: [0,2] TrapFrame @ f4dc0d64) WARNING: Frame IP not in any known module. Following frames may be wrong. 0197fb94 77308dc1 0197fbdc 025c1ec0 03478e70 0x77306f5f 0197fbbc 77309b4a 0197fbdc 00000000 00000001 0x77308dc1 0197ff18 7730a711 02560008 00000000 00000000 0x77309b4a 0197ffb4 7c80b729 00000000 00000000 00000000 0x7730a711 0197ffec 00000000 7730a5f7 00000000 00000000 0x7c80b729 

问题仍然是如何获得EIP的问题。 似乎Windbg知道如何做,但我想了解如何。 看起来_KTRAP_FRAME在_KTHREAD-> KernelStack – 4。

你非常接近,但是当前正在运行的线程被一个中断中断,当时(当调用nt!KeUpdateSystemTime()时),KTRAP_FRAME(被中断的线程保存的寄存器)被放到堆栈上。

(注意:在Windows XP SP3 x86上进行实时内核调试)。

重新加载hal符号; 见BP并去:

 0: kd>.reload /f hal 0: kd> bl 0 e 805450d0 0001 (0001) nt!KeUpdateSystemTime 1 e 806e5e54 0001 (0001) hal!HalpClockInterrupt 0: kd> g 

好吧,BP打在nt!KeUpdateSystemTime:

 Breakpoint 0 hit nt!KeUpdateSystemTime: 805450d0 b90000dfff mov ecx,0FFDF0000h 

让我们看看堆栈,包括FPO和陷阱帧:

 0: kd> kv ChildEBP RetAddr Args to Child afb47d64 004482ef badb0d00 01bbb9c4 00000000 nt!KeUpdateSystemTime (FPO: [0,2] TrapFrame @ afb47d64) WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong. 01f9d814 004483f1 01bb0020 01bbb9c4 000006a2 gfsvc32+0x482ef 01f9d828 004488ef 02c108c0 00081000 000003e8 gfsvc32+0x483f1 01f9d890 0044dc92 000102ee 01f9fd8c 02c108c0 gfsvc32+0x488ef 01f9feac 00437c59 000102ee 00000c90 00000000 gfsvc32+0x4dc92 01f9ffb4 7c80b729 00c9cb40 01e9fffc 00000020 gfsvc32+0x37c59 01f9ffe0 7c80b72f 00000000 00000000 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x37 (FPO: [Non-Fpo]) 01f9ffe4 00000000 00000000 00000000 004a6727 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x3d (FPO: [Non-Fpo]) 

Userland线程中断,陷阱帧位于0x afb47d64 。 我们来看看线程:

 0: kd> !thread THREAD 8a3702e8 Cid 0c90.0cf8 Teb: 7ffd5000 Win32Thread: e198a360 RUNNING on processor 0 Not impersonating DeviceMap e1f236f0 Owning Process 0 Image: <Unknown> Attached Process 89e7fda0 Image: testk.exe Wait Start TickCount 21252 Ticks: 2 (0:00:00:00.031) Context Switch Count 45160 IdealProcessor: 0 LargeStack UserTime 00:00:18.281 coreelTime 00:00:20.125 Win32 Start Address 0x004a6727 Start Address kernel32!BaseThreadStartThunk (0x7c810729) Stack Init afb48000 Current afb479c4 Base afb48000 Limit afb44000 Call 0 Priority 13 BasePriority 13 PriorityDecrement 0 DecrementCount 16 ChildEBP RetAddr Args to Child afb47d64 004482ef badb0d00 01bbb9c4 00000000 nt!KeUpdateSystemTime (FPO: [0,2] TrapFrame @ afb47d64) WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong. 01f9d814 004483f1 01bb0020 01bbb9c4 000006a2 gfsvc32+0x482ef 01f9d828 004488ef 02c108c0 00081000 000003e8 gfsvc32+0x483f1 01f9d890 0044dc92 000102ee 01f9fd8c 02c108c0 gfsvc32+0x488ef 01f9feac 00437c59 000102ee 00000c90 00000000 gfsvc32+0x4dc92 01f9ffb4 7c80b729 00c9cb40 01e9fffc 00000020 gfsvc32+0x37c59 01f9ffe0 7c80b72f 00000000 00000000 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x37 (FPO: [Non-Fpo]) 01f9ffe4 00000000 00000000 00000000 004a6727 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x3d (FPO: [Non-Fpo]) 

所以当线程中断时,Hal!HalpClockInterrupt()被调用(参见ISR的!idt -a),并创建一个陷阱帧。 陷阱帧指针当前在ebp寄存器中:

 0: kd> r @ebp ebp=afb47d64 

所以,EBP =指向KTRAP_FRAME = 0x afb47d64的指针

陷阱帧就像一个“上下文”结构,因为它使所有寄存器不受中断线程的影响。 让我们看看eip的偏移是什么:

 0: kd> dt nt!_ktrap_frame eip +0x068 Eip : Uint4B 

EIP在KTRAP_FRAME结构的偏移量0x68处。 只需应用偏移量:

 0: kd> dd @ebp+0x68 L1 afb47dcc 004482ef 

EIP = 0x4482ef时用户登陆线程被中断。 让我们使用'.trap'命令来确认(可能是'.trap afb47d64'而不是@ebp):

 0: kd> .trap @ebp ErrCode = 00000000 eax=00002ba2 ebx=00c9cb40 ecx=01bb0020 edx=01bbb9c4 esi=00c9cb40 edi=01e9fffc eip=004482ef esp=01f9d814 ebp=01f9d814 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na po nc cs=001b ss=0023 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0030 gs=0000 efl=00000202 gfsvc32+0x482ef: 001b:004482ef eb07 jmp gfsvc32+0x482f8 (004482f8) 

顺便说一句,你可以很容易地看到陷阱框架是如何构建的hal!HalpClockInterrupt()通过反汇编:

 0: kd> u hal!HalpClockInterrupt L0n10 hal!HalpClockInterrupt: 806e5e54 54 push esp 806e5e55 55 push ebp 806e5e56 53 push ebx 806e5e57 56 push esi 806e5e58 57 push edi 806e5e59 83ec54 sub esp,54h 806e5e5c 8bec mov ebp,esp 806e5e5e 89442444 mov dword ptr [esp+44h],eax 806e5e62 894c2440 mov dword ptr [esp+40h],ecx 806e5e66 8954243c mov dword ptr [esp+3Ch],edx 

查看上面的偏移量如何对应于KTRAP_FRAME成员偏移量:

 0: kd> dt nt!_ktrap_frame eax +0x044 Eax : Uint4B 0: kd> dt nt!_ktrap_frame ecx +0x040 Ecx : Uint4B 0: kd> dt nt!_ktrap_frame edx +0x03c Edx : Uint4B 

希望它能回答你的问题。

编辑

正如我的例子是在Win XP SP3上,您可能在其他Windows系统上有不同的函数名称。

Win8.1(x86)上的示例 如果你不能找到时钟中断函数的名字,我会尝试先检查IDT:

 0: kd>idt -a [...snip...] 6b2ac55a000000d1: 81a237c8 hal!HalpTimerClockInterrupt 6b2ac55a000000d2: 81a23aa4 hal!HalpTimerClockIpiRoutine [...snip...] 

256个矢量中只有两个在其名称中有“时钟”(注意一个用于IPI [Inter Processor Interrupt],另一个用于通常的时钟中断)。

我会去hal!HalpTimerClockInterrupt,尝试进入这个函数,看看哪些函数稍后调用。

发生这种情况,你可以在nt!KiUpdateTime或nt!KiUpdateRunTime函数上打破:

 0: kd> !thread THREAD 9d0af680 Cid 0bec.0bf0 Teb: 7f8ae000 Win32Thread: 9ce51470 RUNNING on processor 0 Not impersonating DeviceMap a0971118 Owning Process 9d161c40 Image: calc.exe Attached Process N/A Image: N/A Wait Start TickCount 63249 Ticks: 3 (0:00:00:00.046) Context Switch Count 66956 IdealProcessor: 0 UserTime 00:01:12.609 coreelTime 00:00:01.281 Win32 Start Address calc!WinMainCRTStartup (0x003db8d4) Stack Init ac49bfe0 Current ac49be04 Base ac49c000 Limit ac499000 Call 0 Priority 10 BasePriority 8 UnusualBoost 0 ForegroundBoost 2 IoPriority 2 PagePriority 5 ChildEBP RetAddr Args to Child ac49bcf4 81ad2ef6 81c63c50 00000002 00000000 nt!KiUpdateRunTime (FPO: [Non-Fpo]) ac49bd40 81bdf7a7 ac49be38 ffd0fc98 00000002 nt!KiUpdateTime+0x23c (FPO: [Non-Fpo]) ac49bd90 81a134ae 81a10858 ffffffff ac49beb8 nt!KeClockInterruptNotify+0x67 (FPO: [0,15,4]) ac49bda0 81a23993 00000002 000000d1 00000000 hal!HalpTimerClockInterruptCommon+0x3e (FPO: [0,0,4]) ac49bda0 81a10858 00000002 000000d1 00000000 hal!HalpTimerClockInterrupt+0x1cb (FPO: [0,2] TrapFrame @ ac49be38) ac49beb8 81a239f3 00000000 ac49bf54 00200006 hal!HalEndSystemInterrupt+0xe8 (FPO: [Non-Fpo]) ac49beb8 0041be09 00000000 ac49bf54 00200006 hal!HalpTimerClockInterrupt+0x22b (FPO: [0,2] TrapFrame @ ac49bf54) 0094c978 003c55f2 00000000 00000031 00ad55bc calc!WindowsCodecs_NULL_THUNK_DATA_DLB+0x79 0094c994 003c586b 00aded98 0094c9b8 003c599d calc!CUIController::displayEvent+0x76 (FPO: [1,1,4]) 0094c9a0 003c599d 00ad5574 00adeea0 00aded98 calc!CDisplayEvent::deliver+0x1a (FPO: [Non-Fpo]) 0094c9b8 003d5177 00aded98 5b5012f1 00000000 calc!CEventRegistry::fire+0x28 (FPO: [Non-Fpo]) 0094c9e4 003d575a 00aded98 00adeea0 03bf38ec calc!CCalculatorState::SetBinaryDigitDisplay+0x75 (FPO: [Non-Fpo]) 

(注意:不要太在意上面的两个陷阱帧,看起来第一个例程在使用STI指令重新使能中断的时候被中断,所以有两个陷阱帧,而不是一个)。